Have you ever wondered what the Elements Model is and how useful is it in Psychotherapy? Or indeed have you ever heard of the Elements Model?
The Elements Model, devised by CCPE, is a transpersonal integrative approach to understanding of personality and emphasises the potential of clients. So far so good you might think, isn’t that what all approaches are about? The Elements Model indicates that whilst we might have a particular orientation, we can develop other parts for a more balanced type. This is different to what Jung believed. For Jung, we have a type of personality in that in some areas of our life, we are extroverted but introverted in other areas, although this is not to say that integration, change and transformation cannot take place in Jungian therapy. The Elements Model has 3 positions: expressive, receptive and balanced. Therefore, the model comprises twelve types in all, master, prophet and saint. However, no one is a pure type in this model as one can oscillate between different positions but the aim is to achieve relative emotional equilibrium by being balanced in all elements.
The ELEMENTS MODEL
1. air (expressive, receptive, balanced)
2. fire (expressive, receptive, balanced)
3. water (expressive, receptive, balanced)
4. earth (expressive, receptive, balanced)
The focus of the Elements Model is on unfolding qualities
The Elements Model in its current form is unique to the CCPE’s transpersonal approach to understanding personality as ‘an individual’s unique expression of the divine’; its focus is unfolding qualities (Gruber, 2007). The aim of the Elements Model is to bring balance and harmony between the elements. Speaking one’s truth (fire quality) without sensitivity and empathy (water qualities) can become blunt hurtfulness and arrogance. In transpersonal therapy the therapist must then identify the quality that is needed to restore balance. The aim of everyone is to be the Prophet as therapist, can a client either be master or saint. This is done in stages and several rules apply. However, developing a new element is the most difficult thing to do. One should try to balance an element that is already strong before trying to develop a new element.
In order to develop latent qualities, it is necessary to see those qualities in another person. The one who sees beauty becomes beautiful. The therapist assesses with the client which quality is needed to enable them to deal more effectively with a problem. The Elements Model is thus a holistic health model that affirms existing qualities within a person and is underpinned with a belief in human potential – a potential that has its roots in our essential spiritual nature as well as showing similarities with the humanist approach of person centred.
neither evidence-based, nor underpinned by science
I like an approach that affirms existing qualities and one in which focuses on potential. Critics of the Elements Model, however, suggest that being unique to CCPE renders it of limited use in a multidisciplinary setting. It is neither evidence-based, nor underpinned by science, but encourages observation and inner knowing rather than learned knowledge. Critics also argue that those with borderline personality or psychotic symptoms are not appropriate candidates for transpersonal therapy techniques because of the potential for ego defences to be overwhelmed. But these conditions are probably relative contraindications at best. However, for Linehan , she used mindfulness techniques and visualisation with borderline patients in Dialectical Behaviour Therapy and suggested that even patients with fragile or unstable ego functioning can benefit from such work.
when and indeed how I intervene is what makes psychotherapy an art form
Transpersonal psychotherapy is not alone in encompassing spirituality into treatment. Other modalities allow for the spiritual in their therapeutic approach but transpersonal psychotherapy actively involves the spiritual element in the client work. However, when using transpersonal tools and techniques it is important to acknowledge that bodywork and meditation can only give me images and these must reflect the client narrative. I may have all sorts of theories in my head and techniques up my sleeve but these will be redundant if I am not truly conscious in the therapeutic relationship. However, when and indeed how I intervene is what maybe makes psychotherapy an art form. If I was interested in purely evidenced based interventions and following a manualised approach then I might have studied CBT or clinical psychology instead.
Thank you for sharing this Noel, and I completely agree with your comment about remaining ‘truly conscious’ with our clients. I feel an important element of psychotherapy is the relationship developed with our client through mindfully intuitive and empathetic awareness. And I particularly like the holistic approach of this model, recognising the clients strengths with an emphasis on awakening other areas of potential and insight.
Hi Kim, had you been aware of the model previously?
Hi Noel, sorry for late reply – I’ve only just seen your response to my comment! No I’ve not come across an actual Elements Model before, but it is something that I work with in my practice, albeit on a very non-structured basis – I suppose to me, it’s about the ability to work more intuitively with my clients – to sense their issue with them. However, I liked how the Elements model outlined it’s process in words and a language that seemed an appropriate way of responding to our clients problems, in a way that didn’t necessarly respond with reason.
Love your articles – and just read the ‘wounded healer syndrome’ – think it gives fantastic insight about the things we experience, and the clarity of the experience once it’s put into words!
Hello, are there any references for the CCPE elements model for further reading? Thank you